Abstract—Recent high profile breaches of regulation by
prominent UK financial institutions suggest that self-regulation
is ineffective. Intuitively, regulatory breaches should result in a
tarnished reputation, but that conjecture is unsubstantiated.
With objective measurement of reputation, we demonstrate
that reputational damage is not a significant deterrent against
regulatory breaches. Imposing regulatory fines is also no
deterrent. We speculate that customers are prepared to
tolerate large regulatory breaches: retail customers provided
they are not affected personally, and corporate customers as
long as investments do not devalue. Regulation has not
previously been linked to reputation, and this result is
significant because it adds to the argument that external
regulation remains necessary. Note is also made of recent
unsuccessful initiatives on self-regulation.
Index Terms—Reputation, reputation index, regulation,
regulatory breaches, correlation.
P. Mitic is with the Dept. of Computer Science, University College
London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK (e-mail:
p.mitic@ucl.ac.uk).
[PDF]
Cite: Peter Mitic, "The Effect of Financial Regulation on Reputation," International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance vol.11, no.6, pp. 128-134, 2020.
Copyright © 2020 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).